Analytics, detection system and video analytics for real-time detection
A modern detection system must combine hardware, software, and rules. Cameras capture images. Edge devices pre-process frames. Central servers aggregate events and store logs. Together they turn cameras into sensors that report events. For terminals this pipeline matters because decisions must happen quickly and with context. Video analytics techniques run on incoming frames to flag anomalies, and they feed structured events to a security team for fast action.
Video analytics uses background subtraction, motion analysis, and object tracking to isolate moving objects and then to classify them. First, background subtraction finds pixels that change. Next, motion analysis groups changes into blobs that represent moving objects. Finally, object tracking links those blobs across frames so systems can identify loiter versus a true left unattended case. These steps power real-time abandoned detection workflows and support automatic detection when thresholds are crossed. For an overview of deep learning in this space see a comprehensive survey of deep learning-based object detection.
Key metrics include latency thresholds, frame-rate requirements, and processing throughput. Latency must stay below actionable limits so security staff can respond. Frame-rate requirements vary; higher FPS helps detect small, sudden events but raises compute needs. Processing throughput ties to the number of simultaneous video streams and to the complexity of the detection algorithm. A site may need dozens or hundreds of streams. Therefore, pipeline design must balance cost, speed, and accuracy to reduce false alarms while ensuring early detection of potential threats. For practical deployment advice, Visionplatform.ai converts existing CCTV into operational sensors, so teams can reuse VMS feeds and keep data on-prem for compliance and fast response.
Real-time matters. If an object left behind goes unnoticed for minutes it can become a security threat. Real-time automatic detection reduces that window and helps catch incidents before they escalate. In airports and other public areas, timely alerts preserve safety and situational awareness. Also, structured events from video analytics can feed dashboards and operational systems to improve throughput and reduce manual search time for lost items.
Object detection techniques: detect with modern detection models
Two broad model families support object detection: two-stage and one-stage detectors. Two-stage detectors like Faster R-CNN generate region proposals first and then classify them. One-stage detectors such as YOLOv4 and RetinaNet predict boxes and classes in a single pass. One-stage models trade some raw accuracy for much higher speed. For example, YOLOv4 can process frames at over 60 frames per second on suitable hardware, enabling real-time monitoring in busy hubs (survey). Meanwhile, RetinaNet improved detection precision on small objects; a RetinaNet with ResNeXt-101-FPN achieved an Average Precision (AP) of 40.8% on benchmarks, which helps when trying to identify small unattended items (IEEE survey).
How do these models handle small unattended items? Detection models that incorporate feature pyramids and stronger backbones perform better on small classes. RetinaNet’s focal loss also boosts small object performance by reweighting training errors. Still, trade-offs remain. Faster models reach real-time object detection but may drop detection accuracy. Slower two-stage models may find tiny bags but require more compute. System designers must balance both factors and pick a model that fits site constraints.
Optimising model size and backbone helps terminal deployments. Use lighter backbones on edge devices like NVIDIA Jetson for many streams, and reserve heavier backbones for server GPUs that handle critical zones. In practice, deploy a mix: an efficient object detector at the edge to produce initial alerts, and a stronger detector at the server for verification. This two-tier approach cuts false positives and keeps latency low. As research indicates, detection accuracy and processing speed vary by model family, so testing on real terminal footage is essential before rollout (survey). Visionplatform.ai supports flexible model strategies so operators can pick a model from a library, improve it on their VMS footage, or build custom classes locally to improve performance without sending data to the cloud.
AI vision within minutes?
With our no-code platform you can just focus on your data, we’ll do the rest
Luggage detection and abandoned luggage detection: reducing suspicious items
Defining what constitutes abandoned luggage matters. Systems often use time thresholds and behavioral cues. For example, an unattended bag that appears without an accompanying person and remains for a configured interval can trigger an alert. This rule helps separate brief drops from true left-behind items. Additional criteria include sudden left-behind events such as a person walking away quickly and leaving bags that do not move with other moving objects. When combined with object classification and tracking, these heuristics form the basis for abandoned object detection.
Luggage detection benefits from layered analysis. First, object classification finds objects such as suitcases or backpacks. Next, object tracking follows those items and correlates them with nearby people. Then, time-based logic labels an item as left unattended if it outlives its associated person in the scene. These steps allow automated detection of abandoned luggage in video and reduce noise from transient interactions. For airports, baggage halls and concourses require tuned thresholds. For advice on airport-specific analytics see Visionplatform.ai’s airport solutions page AI video analytics for airports.
Despite good design, crowded scenes produce false alarms. Some systems report false positive rates of up to 10–15% in complex environments, which burdens security teams and reduces trust in alerts (open vocabulary methods). To reduce nuisance alerts, tune time thresholds by zone, apply context filtering to ignore staff-only areas, and use multi-camera correlation to confirm an object left behind. Also, incorporate anomaly detection to flag unexpected behavior rather than just static objects. With these techniques, you can lower false alarms and focus security resources on real risks.
Detect objects left unattended in public places
Public places present hard challenges. Large numbers of people create occlusions. Moving crowds hide items, and lighting varies across day and night. To robustly detect objects left in public spaces, systems rely on multi-camera tracking and object lifetime analysis across overlapping views. By fusing tracks, the system can confirm that an item remained in a location after the last associated person left the area, reducing misclassification of temporarily unattended objects.
Multi-camera strategies improve reliability. If a bag appears in one view and no person is seen carrying it in adjacent cameras, the system increases the confidence that the object left behind is indeed abandoned. This approach supports left luggage detection using feeds already captured by surveillance cameras. For terminals and train stations, cross-camera confirmation shortens the time to a verified alert and reduces false positives. For a practical reference on how left-behind systems apply in mall settings, see this related solution on left-behind object detection in malls left-behind object detection in malls.
Handling dynamic backgrounds and lighting requires robust preprocessing. Image processing routines normalize exposures and use background modeling to account for slow scene changes. Advanced ai algorithms can adapt to seasonal layout changes and temporary obstructions. In public transportation hubs such as airport terminals and train stations, calibrating cameras and training on site footage improves detection accuracy and lowers detection errors. Finally, combine rules with human review: alerts should reach an on-duty security team for quick assessment so incidents can be resolved before they escalate.
AI vision within minutes?
With our no-code platform you can just focus on your data, we’ll do the rest
Unattended, abandoned object and abandoned object detection in crowded environments
Distinguishing between temporarily unattended objects and truly abandoned object instances demands nuanced logic. Simple time thresholds will flag many benign cases, so you need prioritisation rules. A system should weigh object size, location, and surrounding activity. Large suitcases in a terminal’s middle pathway get a higher priority than a small bag near a gate bench. Location matters since items left near restricted zones pose more risk.
Prioritisation supports efficient response. For example, a tiered alert policy might label items as low, medium, or high risk based on object type and proximity to crowds. That helps dispatchers allocate resources. Integration with security workflows improves handling: low-priority events can route to operations for bag pickup, while high-priority alerts trigger immediate lockdown procedures. This practical workflow reduces the number of false alarms that reach tactical teams and ensures the security team focuses on real threats.
Real-world trials show benefits. Pilots at busy transport hubs demonstrate that multi-camera correlation and human-in-the-loop review cut false positives and speed response. For instance, integrating object detector outputs with security systems and with VMS integrations such as Milestone XProtect lets operators trace an object’s history and capture abandoned luggage in video for forensic review. Visionplatform.ai’s Milestone integration page explains how video and events can feed existing control rooms Milestone XProtect integration for airport CCTV. In crowded areas, balancing automation against supervised verification remains the best way to enhance security and situational awareness while keeping nuisance alerts low.
Advanced analytics for object left behind detection
Advanced analytics extend core detection capabilities. Open-vocabulary detection allows models to recognise novel categories with few or no manual labels. These approaches use pseudo bounding-box labels to expand coverage for unexpected objects; see research on open vocabulary methods (open vocabulary detection). In terminals, this helps spot unusual suspicious objects that have not been pre-labelled.
Multimodal sensor fusion combines visual, thermal, and radar data to improve robustness, particularly in low light or through partial occlusion. Radar and thermal streams can confirm the presence of a physical object when visual signals are weak. This fusion reduces detection errors and helps with early detection of potential security incidents in real-time. Also, human-AI collaboration remains crucial. Supervisors should review medium- and high-priority alerts to weed out false positives and to retrain models on site-specific edge cases.
Future trends include adaptive learning, contextual awareness, and continuous model updates. Adaptive algorithms can learn from operator feedback and adjust thresholds automatically. Contextual signals such as flight schedules or cleaning operations can reduce unnecessary alerts during busy boarding times. For deployments, consider solutions that keep data and models on-prem to meet GDPR and EU AI Act needs. Visionplatform.ai emphasises on-prem and edge deployment, allowing teams to retain control of data, to publish structured events over MQTT, and to operationalise camera feeds beyond simple alarms. Together these capabilities support both security and operations by helping to identify and track items left behind, improving accuracy and enhancing safety across public areas such as airports and train stations.
FAQ
How does a detection system identify an item left unattended?
Systems combine object classification, object tracking, and time-based rules. First, the system classifies objects such as bags that may be suspicious; then it tracks them across frames and cameras. If no associated person remains near the object past a configured interval, the system flags it as left unattended and sends an alert to the security team.
What is the difference between real-time and real time detection?
Real-time typically refers to processing that meets strict latency thresholds so operators can act immediately. Real time is another way to describe processing that occurs without significant delay. Both terms emphasise prompt handling, but deployment specifics determine exact latency requirements for a site.
Can these systems run on existing surveillance cameras?
Yes. Many platforms, including Visionplatform.ai, use existing CCTV and VMS feeds to build object detection systems. This approach reduces hardware costs and preserves camera investments while adding analytics capabilities such as left luggage detection and loiter detection.
How do you reduce false positives in abandoned luggage detection?
Tune time thresholds by zone, use multi-camera correlation, and apply context filters like scheduled cleaning periods. Also, combine automatic detection with supervised review so operators can quickly dismiss benign events and improve the model through feedback.
Are multimodal sensors necessary for accurate detection?
They are not always necessary but they help in challenging conditions. Thermal and radar can complement cameras when lighting is poor or when occlusion occurs. Fusion of modalities boosts confidence and lowers detection errors.
How do advanced models handle new object types?
Open-vocabulary methods and pseudo-labelled training can extend recognition to novel items without exhaustive manual labels. This enables models to detect unexpected suspicious objects and to adapt faster to site-specific needs.
What role do humans play in automated detection?
Humans provide critical supervision. They verify medium and high-priority alerts, tune thresholds, and supply feedback that supports continuous learning. This human-AI collaboration cuts false positives and ensures actionable alerts reach responders.
Can these systems integrate with airport security systems?
Yes. For example, integrations with Milestone XProtect or other VMS let teams correlate detections with recorded footage and command-and-control workflows. Integration makes alerts more actionable and supports forensic review after incidents.
How quickly can a system detect an abandoned object?
Detection speed varies by configuration. Some one-stage detectors enable initial alerts within fractions of a second per frame. Overall response time depends on frame rate, processing latency, and workflow steps for verification.
What measures improve safety in public transportation hubs?
Combine robust object detection systems, multi-camera tracking, and clear operational protocols. Also, ensure models are trained on site footage and that data remains under local control to meet compliance. Together, these steps improve early detection and help prevent security breaches.
